if someone doesnt need to climb a problem to grade it then how do you sort the wheat from the chaff? the spreadhseet might not be ideal but its certainly more democratic than you deciding who's best qualified to take the best guess.
I don't think democratics (As in one man one vote, all votes are equal) comes into it.
To invent an extreme example. There is a problem somewhere. Some strong kid who has only every climbed in Gravity does it and offers a grade. You, fresh back from a trip to Font, work the moves but don't link it cause you get a flapper. Who is more likely to grade it accurately?
I think I'm the best person to form my own opinions.
There are loads of flaws with just taking the median or mean grade for a problem. But they are irrelevent as
- the whole idea of an accurate grading systems is an impossible dream/nightmare.
- there is no need for an accurate grading system.
Long discussions about what is benchmark 7a++ are pointless, how can you compare a steep roof on edges to a blank smearing slab. It's apples versus oranges.