62
« on: April 25, 2012, 04:30:03 PM »
Trish - lots of people talk about grades, including you, and grades are used all over the world. I do know that somebody like Ayton with his long arms and joho with his not-so-tall stature are going to find things slightly different but with a number of ascents, the level of difficulty should/might become clearer. So it is not whether grades are subjective/objective, there is a clearly a degree of subjectivity, it's about trying to be objective. If you want to not use this system, that's fine and don't use it, stick to climb/can't climb or doable/doable with effort/will never do. These are actually grading systems too, albeit personal and relative.
In my opinion, a benchmark problem is a well travelled problem where a number of people can give their 'opinion' on the difficulty. For problems with one or two ascents, the ascentionist sets the grade but it can hardly be considered as benchmark. I agree with most of yours Dave apart from one or two. Notably, all of these are pretty close to the grades suggested by the guide.
Dark Angle Sit - 6c/6c+ (it's a big pull from the ground?)
Quality Control - 6c
Jiggery Pokery - 6c
Blind stick - 6c+
Rythem and Stealth - 7a
Fuck all left - 7a
Andy's arete - 7a +
Loco - 7a+
Pascals - 7b
The funk - 7b+
Sow your wild oats - 7b+