10
« on: June 01, 2012, 10:11:15 AM »
My whole point is that - and yes, this is my approach to bouldering - placing a pad under a climb doesn't make the climb any less climbed than someone who has no need for a pad.
I don't need a pad for some of the easy lines I've climbed a million times, but it's really never occurred to me to think when I see someone on one of those lines using a pad that they're 'soft core' or ruining their experience!!
My jaw dropped when I heard that a couple of the boulderers I know had done 'Rhythm and Stealth' with no spotters and only one pad... but when I sent the line with Ireland's tallest spotter under me and 3 pads, it didn't occur to me at the top that I should come back on my own for the real send.
My point is that to in any way belittle the achievement of a climber because they used a pad is kind of stupid. The rock is climbed - full stop.
Even the example of that guy who did that hard line in Ceuse with trad gear... So now is the achievement of every sport climber that ever did it wiped?
Come on...