1
Bouldering Discussion / Re: Whose line is it anyway? Closed projects in bouldering
« on: June 12, 2015, 09:00:04 PM »QuoteIt was less of a challenge for John to climb the problem, it was his choice to impose his ethic on the situation.
Hang on, one guy preventing any other person from climbing on a piece of rock indefinitely is having his rights violated?
Requesting, not preventing. And it was a request which was wearing thin. 4 years is a long time. Had you talked to Dave about the problem and the "ban" for want of a better word?
QuoteDespite that, climbing is about more than just the rock. Its a community activity, and as such, empathy and respect are important.
Couldn't agree more, cuts both ways though
Very fair
QuoteIts an objectively pointless sport anyway, why not give up the notion of the big self and revel in the frivolity?
What's your point here Paul? What are you referring to by "the big self" No clue how this supports Dave's stance - I enjoy the frivolity of climbing as much as the next guy, in fact, I enjoy it so much that when I see a beautiful problem I try and have fun and climb on it! My self worth and identity isn't hinged upon being the first person to climb a small rock sitting on a big rock hurtling through the void
I'm not 100% behind Dave's stance. This was directed at Dave's apparent requirement for the FA to stay motivated to work for the problem. Which, like Chris, I think is misguided. But I like to see people pushing themselves. If I had been in the same position I don't think I would have climbed it because that would set back someone else's motivation. I see how thats prioritising the few over the many, but in that case I think its what I would have done. Its not an opinion that everyone will share.
I hope Dave keeps trying the problem.